ECI CONFIRMS IT WROTE TO MHA ON TWO OCCASIONS ECI CONFIRMS THAT IT WROTE TO MHA ON TWO OCCASIONS
FEBRUARY 4, 2013 BY SAGARMEDIA
Date: 4th February 2013

ECI confirms that it wrote to MHA on two occasions complaining about the funding of Political Parties by government companies and foreign sources

Delhi High Court issues notices to Centre, ECI, INC & BJP
A bench of Delhi High Court comprising of justices Sanjay Kishen Kaul and Indermeet Kaur today, on 4th of February 2013, heard for the second time the arguments of a PIL that has alleged that the two political parties namely Indian National Congress (INC) and Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) have violated the Representation of People’s Act (RPA) 1951 and Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) by taking donations from government companies and foreign sources, which is prohibited under both the legislations.

In the first hearing the Delhi High Court had asked the Central Government (Home Ministry) and Election Commission of India (ECI) to file their responses within 2 weeks following the first hearing on 10th January 2013.

Petitioner of the PIL

a)      Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR)
b)      Dr. EAS Sarma, former secretary to the Government of India
Responses from ECI

a)      ECI has responded in its submission to Delhi High Court on the issue of foreign sources of funding to INC and BJP that as per the existing provisions of section 29B of Representation of People’s Act 1951, no political party shall be eligible to accept any contribution from any foreign source defined under clause (e) of Section 2 of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976
b)      ECI has submitted in its response that the commission is not an investigating agency and it cannot detect from the contribution reports (that they have to submit to the ECI under rule 85B of the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 in order to secure the tax relief) of political parties as to which sources of funds belong to foreign companies or their Indian subsidiaries.
c)       ECI has further stated that the onus of investigating and taking of punitive action against any offence committed by political parties, or the PSUs or  the corporate lies with Government of India
d)      ECI has also stated in its affidavit to the court that it wrote to Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) on 28th September 2012 where the commission forwarded the complaints that it received about the foreign sources of contributions that political parties have received.
MHA haven’t responded despite the 2 letters from ECI

After MHA failed to respond to ECI in any manner, ECI wrote another letter on 11th January 2013 requesting for a response to its earlier letter and also asked MHA whether any action had been taken in that regard. MHA also mentioned in the court that Congress has submitted the response but BJP is yet to file theirs.

MHA’s dilly-dallying in the court

In its response MHA has confessed in the court that the ministry has received the complaints from the ECI and that they have called upon the Congress and BJP to furnish their responses in this regard.

Petitioners’ agrument

Prashant Bhushan insisted in the court that Union of India is dragging its feet because the political parties that run the Government have themselves committed serious criminal offences.  He further said that since there is an inherent conflict of interest in this matter this investigation should be conducted by an independent authority.

Court issues notices

Concluding the hearing today, the bench issued formal notices to the Union of India, the Election Commission and to the Congress and BJP and asked them to reply within 3 weeks. The Bench also asked the Union of India to take a final decision and action on the issue within the next 3 weeks and file a fresh affidavit.

Grounds of the PIL

INC and the BJP have violated Section 29B of the Representation of People’s Act 1951, which categorically prohibits them to take donations from government companies and from any foreign source
The donation of huge sums of money made by the Vedanta Group (being a foreign company) to major political parties like INC and BJP is in clear violation of the FCR Act of 1976 and the FCR Act of 2010.
The donation of huge sums of money by the public sector undertakings (who are also State within Article 12 of the Constitution) to the political parties is in violation of Section 293A of the Companies Act.
BJP and INC have confessed to the foreign funding

Both BJP and INC have themselves declared, in their annual contribution reports submitted to the Election Commission of India (ECI), that they have received funding from the Vedanta Group, which is a foreign company listed on London Stock Exchange under the name “Vedanta Resources PLC”.

All the documents related to this PIL can be accessed on ADR website www.adrindia.org