Centre refuses to take stand on Ram Setu, asks SC to decide
|
Appearing
before a bench headed by justices H L Dattu and Anil R Dave, Additional
Solicitor General (ASG) Haren Raval submitted that the government after
consultations on the issue has decided that it would not take any stand
on it.
He
said the government would stand by its earlier affidavit, filed in
2008, in which it had said that the government respects all religions
but it was of view that it should not be called upon to respond to the
issues of faith, except in recognising their existence.
The
bench was hearing a petition filed by Janata Party President
Subramanian Swamy seeking the court's direction to declare Ram Setu a
national monument.
The apex court earlier on 29th March had granted two weeks to the Centre to take a stand on the issue.
"If you say you don't want to file counter affidavit, we can go ahead with the arguments in the case," the bench had said.
The
case relating to Ram Setu came under judicial scrutiny due to a bunch
of petitions filed in the apex court against the ambitious Sethusamudram
project, whose execution allegedly was to damage the mythological
bridge.
Sethusamudram project is aimed at constructing a shorter navigational route around India's
southern tip by breaching the mythological Ram Setu, said to have been
built by Lord Rama's army of monkeys and bears to the demon king
Ravana's kingdom Lanka.
As per the Sethusamudram project, the shipping channel is proposed to be 30 metres wide, 12 metres deep and 167 kms long.
The
Centre in its earlier affidavit, cleared by the Cabinet Committee of
Political Affairs (CCPA) chaired by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, had
said the government respects all religions but was of view that it
"should not be called upon to respond to the issues of faith, except in
recognising their existence."
The
amended affidavit was filed after the Centre had withdrawn its two
affidavits in which it had questioned the existence of Lord Ram and "Ram
Setu".
Comments
Post a Comment