From 1980 to 2008, an average of 52 species per year moved one category closer to extinction on the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Endangered Species----a
rate that shows no signs of slowing. Although mass extinctions have
occurred on Earth throughout geologic time, the current loss of
biodiversity is the first to be caused overwhelmingly by a single
species: humans. The five principal pressures causing biodiversity loss
are habitat change, overexploitation, pollution, invasive alien species,
and climate change, all of which are almost exclusively human driven.
"The current model of
consumer societies is destroying the planet and its resources," said Bo
Normander, Director of Worldwatch Institute Europe and a contributing
author to State of the World 2012. "This must change in order for the planet to sustain future generations."
At the 1992 United
Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil, leaders made a commitment to preserve biological resources by
signing the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), but there remains a
fundamental lack of political will to act on biodiversity threats. In
2002, the CBD promised "a significant reduction of the current rate of
biodiversity loss" by 2010, yet within those eight years, most countries
failed to meet their targets.
To combat the loss of
Earth's natural capital, scientists strive to assign concrete values to
natural resources with the hope that an economic appreciation of
ecosystem services may facilitate improved planning and management of
Earth's systems. Yet progress on developing accurate, straightforward,
and widely accepted measures for assessing ecosystem values remains
slow.
"Accurate valuation
of ecosystem services is vital to create greater accountability and
awareness of the ecological impact of our actions," said Erik
Assadourian, Worldwatch senior fellow and State of the World 2012
project co-director. "By understanding ecosystem services in monetary
or physical terms, leaders can assess and improve the sustainability of
their policies."
Current international
practices discount future generations by effectively valuing ecosystem
services at zero. Such undervaluing is often a result of society's
ignorance of the full benefits that humans derive from an intact
ecosystem. Thus, individuals make decisions based on the immediate
financial gains of logging a forest, for example, instead of considering
the "invisible" benefits of the forest, such as carbon sequestration,
flood protection, and habitat for pollinators.
Valuing ecosystems
and their services is difficult as knowledge is limited by the
complexity of environmental systems. Many linkages between organisms are
yet to be discovered, and slight perturbations may have dramatic,
unforeseen consequences. Despite these challenges, scientists and
politicians attempt to frame the benefits provided by ecosystems using
relatable monetary or physical indices. The two most common methods are
to create a common asset trust, which "propertizes" the public good
without privatizing ecosystems; and to pay for ecosystem services, such
as when farmers are paid to leave land fallow for improved soil health.
In State of the World 2012, Worldwatch provides several recommendations for enhancing ecosystem service valuation, including:
Manage ecosystem services on an appropriate scale:
Ecosystem services must be evaluated on spatial and temporal scales, in
order to determine which institution can effectively manage that
ecosystem. Collaboration between scales of government and those managing
the services is vital.
Include the global poor in valuation:
The world's poor and indigenous groups rely heavily on natural
resources and common goods for sustenance and livelihood. Many attempts
at valuing ecosystem services, such as designating a forest as a
preserved trust, have excluded indigenous groups from their traditional
sources of food and fuel----an approach that not only is unjust, but will also undermine the long-term success of these efforts.
In addition to these
approaches to valuation, Worldwatch champions initiatives that protect
biodiversity, such as urban gardening and beekeeping, inclusive forest
protection, and the creation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), or zones
in the world's oceans or coastal waters where activities like fishing
and mining are strictly regulated. These added protections increase
biodiversity within the MPA, which in turn enriches the surrounding
waters and ecosystems. Despite the known advantages of MPAs, they
protect only 0.8 percent of the world's oceans.
Worldwatch applauds
these efforts to combat the loss of global biodiversity. But to truly
protect biodiversity and value ecosystem services effectively,
multinational cooperation is required. Worldwatch's State of the World 2012,
released in April 2012, focuses on steps in biodiversity protection and
other areas that can be taken at Rio+20, the 20-year follow-up to the
historic 1992 Rio Earth Summit, to make progress toward sustainable
development.
Comments
Post a Comment